I spent $600,000 on this diamond-encrusted blog entry

April 15th, 2008 | by Paul |

In a combination of the asinine and the obvious, the wealthiest of the wealthies are still spending like Richie Rich coupled with Bruce Wayne and Santa, according to this New York Times article.

I call it asinine because it is. The article at one point describes an upcoming ritzy party at the Plaza Hotel.

“It will feature a dozen female string musicians made up to look like statues and clothed in dresses of fresh flowers, like roses and gardenias. There will be caviar and Cognac bars, as well as a buffet designed to visually replicate 17th-century Dutch paintings from the recent Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibit, “The Age of Rembrandt.”

Or this.

The ($50,000, four-day) trip (for four people) was an exercise in luxuriant male bonding. Mr. Tachman, who is 38, and his friends got around by private jet, helicopter, Hummer limousine, Ferraris and Lamborghinis; stayed in V.I.P. rooms at Casa Casuarina, the South Beach hotel that was formerly Gianni Versace’s mansion; and played “extreme adventure paintball” with former agents of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration.

… they soldiered on until the moment the wheels of their private jet returned to the tarmac in New York. There were hand-rolled cigars, massages, guided rides in racing boats and fighter jets — all arranged by In The Know Experiences, a travel and concierge service in Manhattan.

Jackasses.

But I also called it obvious. They’re rich people. That’s what rich people do.

I’m sorry, I mean the super-rich. The rich people are hurting.

[P]roviders of luxury goods reported anecdotal evidence of a widening gap between the merely rich and the ultrarich. Clifford Greenhouse, who owns a household-staff employment company, said he suspects that the merely rich might be starting to lag behind their far richer counterparts, and are trimming their budgets. He cited reduced demand for chauffeurs — a relatively small-ticket service — yet ever-strong demand for private chefs, butlers and “household managers.”

So, apparently, there’s a widening gap between rich and poor, super-rich and rich and, for some reason, chauffeurs and butlers. We live in a crazy-ass world.

  1. One Response to “I spent $600,000 on this diamond-encrusted blog entry”

  2. By Guy Cross on Apr 16, 2008 | Reply

    I get the vibe that you aren’t to keen on wealthy people.

    Personally I have no issues with rich people, my issues are with how rich people like almost all British and North American people (I consider myself rich because I have more money than I need)spend our money.

    The best example of this that springs to mind is that my Mum used to say wasting food was a bad thing. Now Iam comming to think that buying so much food that there is enough to waste is a bigger problem, as it ties up our finances when they could be put to better use.

    Having lots of money isn’t the problem, it’s what you do with it that matters.

    Guy
    http://www.sleepywhisper.com

Post a Comment